Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1971 May 1;133(5):1074-89.
doi: 10.1084/jem.133.5.1074.

Mechanisms of recovery from a generalized viral infection: mousepox. II. Passive transfer of recovery mechanisms with immune lymphoid cells

Mechanisms of recovery from a generalized viral infection: mousepox. II. Passive transfer of recovery mechanisms with immune lymphoid cells

R V Blanden. J Exp Med. .

Abstract

The following passive transfer experiments evaluated the contributions of the various host responses in recovery from mousepox. (a) Immune spleen cells transferred highly efficient antiviral activity, but preinfected recipients of these cells made no detectable splenic interferon or antibody in the 24 hr interval after cell transfer. (b) Passively administered interferon was ineffective. (c) Recipients of hyperimmune serum had much more antibody than recipients of immune spleen cells but significantly less antiviral activity. (d) Immune spleen cell populations with antiviral activity contained mediators of CMI to virus antigens. (e) The antiviral activity of immune spleen cells was specific; it was inhibited by in vitro treatment with ATS, anti-light chain serum, and anti-theta ascitic fluid, but not by removal of mononuclear phagocytes from the immune population. These results are interpreted to mean that recovery mechanisms conferred by immune spleen cells were triggered by specifically sensitized, thymus-derived lymphocytes, and that antibody and interferon responses were of less importance. A radiosensitive recipient component was necessary for the full expression of the antiviral activity of both immune cells and immune serum. It seemed likely that this component was the blood monocyte.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Br J Exp Pathol. 1966 Apr;47(2):168-76 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Med. 1966 Aug 1;124(2):241-54 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Med. 1966 Oct 1;124(4):585-600 - PubMed
    1. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1967;70(1):58-66 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Med. 1968 Sep 1;128(3):415-35 - PubMed

MeSH terms