Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1971 May;21(5):922-7.
doi: 10.1128/am.21.5.922-927.1971.

Comparison of media for the enumeration of Clostridium perfringens

Comparison of media for the enumeration of Clostridium perfringens

S M Harmon et al. Appl Microbiol. 1971 May.

Abstract

For the enumeration of viable vegetative cells and spores of Clostridium perfringens, noncommercial (laboratory prepared) sulfite-polymyxin-sulfadiazine (SPS) agar, tryptone-sulfite-neomycin (TSN) agar, and Shahidi-Ferguson-perfringens (SFP) agar were statistically compared to SPS agar without antibiotics. The selectivities of these four media were also evaluated on the basis of their ability to inhibit the growth of pure cultures of a variety of other organisms. The average recovery of vegetative cells of 10 strains of C. perfringens with SFP agar was not significantly higher than with SPS agar with 10(4) organisms per g, but with 10(6) organisms per g it yielded significantly higher recoveries than SPS agar. TSN agar yielded significantly lower recoveries at both inoculum levels. SFP agar gave significantly higher recoveries of spores than SPS and TSN agars. Average plate counts of spores in SFP agar were 75% as high as in SPS agar without antibiotics, but only 45% of the spores grew in SPS agar and 25% in TSN agar. TSN agar was the most selective of the three media, but the selectivity of SPS agar approached that of TSN agar under the test conditions. SFP agar, which was the least selective of the media, allowed growth to some extent of nearly all of the facultative anaerobes tested.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Bacteriol. 1969 May;98(2):407-14 - PubMed
    1. J Bacteriol. 1947 Feb;53(2):139-47 - PubMed
    1. Appl Microbiol. 1965 Jul;13:559-63 - PubMed
    1. Appl Microbiol. 1968 Jan;16(1):82-9 - PubMed
    1. Appl Microbiol. 1962 May;10:193-9 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources