Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1973 Apr;114(1):267-72.
doi: 10.1128/jb.114.1.267-272.1973.

Physiological modifications in the production and repair of methyl methane sulfonate-induced breaks in the deoxyribonucleic acid of Escherichia coli K-12

Physiological modifications in the production and repair of methyl methane sulfonate-induced breaks in the deoxyribonucleic acid of Escherichia coli K-12

D A Scudiero et al. J Bacteriol. 1973 Apr.

Abstract

The medium in which Rec(+) strains of Escherichia coli K-12 are grown affected their sensitivity to treatment with methyl methane sulfonate (MMS). Rec(+) cells grown to the stationary phase in glucose-enriched nutrient broth (GNB) were more resistant to MMS than cells grown in nutrient broth (NB). The repair of MMS-induced breaks (or alkali-labile bonds) in the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from E. coli K-12 strains AB1157, AB1886 uvrA6, and SR111 recA13 recB21 grown in GNB and NB media was examined by means of alkaline sucrose gradient centrifugation. It appeared that essentially all of the repair of breaks that occurred, as evidenced by an increase in "molecular weight," took place within 10 min after treatment with MMS under our conditions. Cell survival was highest in cells for which the size of the DNA after the post-treatment incubation was the largest. The largest DNA after post-treatment incubation was found in Rec(+) cells grown in GNB medium. The results suggest that these cells may have an enhanced capacity for repairing breaks in DNA.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Bacteriol. 1967 Mar;93(3):1056-62 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1966 Oct 29;212(5061):534-5 - PubMed
    1. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1968;33:277-87 - PubMed
    1. Radiat Res. 1969 Aug;39(2):421-35 - PubMed
    1. J Mol Biol. 1970 Mar;48(3):395-408 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources