Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1974 Dec;37(12):1352-60.
doi: 10.1136/jnnp.37.12.1352.

Segmental reflex pathways in spinal shock and spinal spasticity in man

Comparative Study

Segmental reflex pathways in spinal shock and spinal spasticity in man

P Ashby et al. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1974 Dec.

Abstract

Activity in three segmental pathways was compared in normal subjects, patients with spinal shock, and patients with established spinal spasticity. The Achilles tendon reflex (ATR) was used to estimate transmission in the Ia monosynaptic pathway. Evidence is produced implying that vibration activates motoneurones principally through a polysynaptic pathway. The tonic vibration reflex (TVR) was used to estimate transmission in this Ia polysynaptic pathway. The percentage of the motoneurone pool (M-response) that could be activated by these pathways was used as a measure of transmission. The H reflex (vibration)/H reflex (control) ratio was used as an estimate of the degree of presynaptic inhibition of the Ia monosynaptic pathway. The findings led to the following conclusions. (1) In spinal shock presynaptic inhibition is greater than normal, transmission in the Ia monosynaptic pathway is reduced, and in the Ia polysynaptic pathway virtually abolished. (2) In established spasticity presynaptic inhibition is impaired, transmission in the Ia monosynaptic pathway is increased, but transmission in the Ia polysynaptic pathway never recovers. (3) The failure of presynaptic inhibition associated with spasticity is a gradual process. A hypothesis to explain these findings is proposed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Experientia. 1964 Nov 15;20(11):628-9 - PubMed
    1. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1966 Feb;29(1):1-11 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1966 May;184(2):450-72 - PubMed
    1. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1967 Aug;30(4):325-31 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1967 Oct;192(3):773-800 - PubMed

Publication types