Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1971 Jul;9(1):63-77.

Prolonged administration of antithymocyte serum in mice. I. Observations on cellular and humoral immunity

Prolonged administration of antithymocyte serum in mice. I. Observations on cellular and humoral immunity

S L Nehlsen. Clin Exp Immunol. 1971 Jul.

Abstract

A colony of 400 CBA/He mice was divided into three groups: (a) mice injected continually throughout life with rabbit antimouse thymocyte serum (ATS), (b) mice treated in the same manner with normal rabbit serum (NRS), and (c) mice left untreated.

The cellular immune competence of all groups was tested by the transplantation of allografts or rat xenografts, by testing the ability of their lymphoid cells to mount a graft-versus-host reaction, by measuring the in vivo response of their lymphocytes to oxazolone skin-painting and the in vitro response to phytohaemagglutinin, and finally by measuring the organ distribution of the θ-positive, thymus-dependent lymphocyte population. Determinations were made of the antibody responses to sheep erythrocytes, allografts and rat xenografts, bovine serum albumin, keyhole limpet haemocyanin, and polyoma virus.

The ATS-treated mice grew and reproduced normally and did not succumb to bacterial infections. Polyoma virus, probably introduced in the rabbit serum, induced tumours in only some of the ATS-treated mice. Only two lymphomas (0·8%) occurred in this same group; tumours were not seen in the other groups.

These results do not support any hypothesis which attributes to lymphocytes a non-immunological function, nor do they support a simple form of the immunological surveillance theory in relation to cancer. Several possible explanations for the increased incidence of tumours in transplant patients are proposed, which take into account the difficulty experienced in this study in abrogating a `cellular immune response' with antilymphocytic serum alone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nature. 1966 Jan 29;209(5022):521-3 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1966 Dec 17;212(5068):1316-7 - PubMed
    1. Transplantation. 1966 Sep;4(5):618-32 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1968 Feb 29;278(9):479-83 - PubMed
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1968 Feb;40(2):231-41 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources