Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1974 Oct;28(4):647-50.
doi: 10.1128/am.28.4.647-650.1974.

Modified laminar flow biological safety cabinet

Modified laminar flow biological safety cabinet

G J McGarrity et al. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Oct.

Abstract

Tests are reported on a modified laminar flow biological safety cabinet in which the return air plenum that conducts air from the work area to the high efficiency particulate air filters is under negative pressure. Freon gas released inside the cabinet could not be detected outside by a freon gas detection method capable of detecting 10(-6) cc/s. When T3 bacteriophage was aerosolized 5 cm outside the front opening in 11 tests, no phage could be detected inside the cabinet with the motor-filter unit in operation. An average of 2.8 x 10(5) plaque-forming units (PFU)/ft(3) (ca. 0.028 m(3)) were detected with the motor-filter unit not in operation, a penetration of 0.0%. Aerosolization 5 cm inside the cabinet yielded an average of 10 PFU/ft(3) outside the cabinet with the motor-filter unit in operation and an average of 4.1 x 10(5) PFU/ft(3) with the motor-filter unit not in operation, a penetration of 0.002%. These values are the same order of effectiveness as the positive-pressure laminar flow biological safety cabinets previously tested. The advantages of the negative-pressure return plenum design include: (i) assurance that if cracks or leaks develop in the plenum it will not lead to discharge of contaminated air into the laboratory; and (ii) the price is lower due to reduced manufacturing costs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Appl Microbiol. 1968 Jul;16(7):1086-92 - PubMed
    1. Appl Microbiol. 1968 Aug;16(8):1225-9 - PubMed
    1. Appl Microbiol. 1968 Oct;16(10):1478-82 - PubMed
    1. Appl Microbiol. 1968 Dec;16(12):1895-900 - PubMed
    1. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1972 Dec 1;161(11):1557-67 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources