Significance of chronic bifascicular block without apparent organic heart disease
- PMID: 445730
- DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.60.1.33
Significance of chronic bifascicular block without apparent organic heart disease
Abstract
Eighty-six of 452 patients (19%) with chronic bifascicular block were found to have no clinically apparent associated organic heart disease (OHD) and were defined as having primary conduction disease (PCD). Comparison of patients with PCD and OHD revealed a significantly lower incidence of the following clinical variables in the PCD patients (p less than 0.001): exertional angina, dyspnea, congestive heart failure, cardiomegaly, functional class I (all by study design), left bundle branch block and premature ventricular contractions. Both mean AH and HV intervals were significantly shorter in patients with PCD (p less than 0.01). The incidence of HV prolongation was 21% in PCD and 41% in OHD patients (p less than 0.001). All patients were prospectively followed for 21-2998 days with a mean +/- SEM of 1209 +/- 66 days for PCD and 1172 +/- 36 days for OHD. Atrioventricular (AV) block developed in three patients from the PCD group and 26 from the OHD group (NS), with spontaneous block occurring in one (1%) PCD patient and 19 (5%) OHD patients (p less than 0.05). Annual mortality due to sudden death as well as total cardiovascular mortality (including sudden death) for the 5-year follow-up was significantly lower in patients with PCD. Patients with PCD have significantly lower incidence of electrophysiologic abnormalities and subsequent spontaneous AV block as well as cardiovascular and sudden death mortality. The diagnosis of PCD based on clinical criteria probably underestimates the presence of underlying OHD, as suggested by a small but definite risk of cardiovascular mortality.
Similar articles
-
Significance of the HV interval in 517 patients with chronic bifascicular block.Circulation. 1981 Dec;64(6):1265-71. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.64.6.1265. Circulation. 1981. PMID: 7296798
-
Incidence and site of atrioventricular block in patients with chronic bifascicular block.Circulation. 1979 Feb;59(2):238-46. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.59.2.238. Circulation. 1979. PMID: 758992
-
Serial electrophysiologic studies in patients with chronic bundle branch block.Circulation. 1982 Jun;65(7):1480-5. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.65.7.1480. Circulation. 1982. PMID: 7074804
-
Bilateral bundle branch block: its recognition and significance.Cardiovasc Clin. 1971;2(3):151-79. Cardiovasc Clin. 1971. PMID: 4950422 Review. No abstract available.
-
First degree atrioventricular block.Eur Heart J. 1984 Mar;5 Suppl A:107-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/5.suppl_a.107. Eur Heart J. 1984. PMID: 6373267 Review.
Cited by
-
Hemiblocks and the fascicular system: myths and implications.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018 Aug;52(3):281-285. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0440-1. Epub 2018 Aug 20. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018. PMID: 30128802 Review.
-
Permanent pacing.Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Sep 26;295(6601):741-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6601.741. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987. PMID: 3119020 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous