. 1974 Apr-Jun;2(2):145-8.

Assessment of the condition of newborns delivered by caesarean section performed for intrauterine foetal distress in relation to the type of anaesthesia

J Bajorek et al. Anaesth Resusc Intensive Ther. 1974 Apr-Jun.

. 1974 Apr-Jun;2(2):145-8.

No abstract available

Similar articles

Neonatal wellbeing after elective caesarean delivery with general, spinal, and epidural anaesthesia.
Ratcliffe FM, Evans JM. Ratcliffe FM, et al. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1993 May;10(3):175-81. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1993. PMID: 8495679
Spinal and epidural versus general anesthesia for elective cesarean section at term: effect on the acid-base status of the mother and newborn.
Petropoulos G, Siristatidis C, Salamalekis E, Creatsas G. Petropoulos G, et al. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003 Apr;13(4):260-6. doi: 10.1080/jmf.13.4.260.266. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003. PMID: 12854928 Clinical Trial.
Alfathesin for anaesthetic induction at caesarean section.
Mahomedy MC, Downing JW, Mahomedy YH. Mahomedy MC, et al. S Afr Med J. 1975 Jun 28;49(27):1095-6. S Afr Med J. 1975. PMID: 239451
[Anaesthesia, a cause of fetal distress?].
Bonnet MP, Bruyère M, Moufouki M, De la Dorie A, Benhamou D. Bonnet MP, et al. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2007 Jul-Aug;26(7-8):694-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2007.05.004. Epub 2007 Jun 14. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2007. PMID: 17572048 Review. French.
Anaesthesia for Caesarean section and neonatal acid-base status: a meta-analysis.
Reynolds F, Seed PT. Reynolds F, et al. Anaesthesia. 2005 Jul;60(7):636-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04223.x. Anaesthesia. 2005. PMID: 15960713 Review.