Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1972 Feb 26;1(5799):539-42.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5799.539.

Effects of salbutamol and isoprenaline-phenylephrine in reversible airways obstruction

Clinical Trial

Effects of salbutamol and isoprenaline-phenylephrine in reversible airways obstruction

R J Alliott et al. Br Med J. .

Abstract

Ventolin (salbutamol) and Medihaler-Duo (isoprenaline/phenylephrine combination) standard pressurized inhalers were used to administer doses of two or six "puffs" to 16 patients with known reversible airways obstruction. The doses were administered in random order over two days. Both the Ventolin and Medihaler-Duo inhalers substantially increased FEV(1), but in the doses used salbutamol was more effective than isoprenaline/phenylephrine (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between two and six puffs of salbutamol, though there seemed to be an advantage of six puffs of isoprenaline/phenylephrine over two puffs (P < 0.05). Adrenaline (1/1,000) 0.5 ml and atropine 0.6 mg produced similar increases in FEV(1) to those produced by salbutamol.The Pao(2) fell more than 5 mm Hg in three patients after salbutamol and in three after isoprenaline/phenylephrine. There was no significant fall in mean Pao(2) in any of the treatment groups. It is concluded that the Ventolin inhalant, administered in the conventional dose of two puffs, is as effective a bronchodilator as subcutaneous adrenaline and atropine, is more effective than the Medihaler-Duo, and is without detectable side effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Thorax. 1966 Jul;21(4):333-6 - PubMed
    1. Thorax. 1968 Jan;23(1):46-55 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1968 Aug 24;219(5156):862-3 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1969 Jan 4;1(5635):31-2 - PubMed
    1. Thorax. 1968 Nov;23(6):590-7 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources