Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1972 Feb;23(2):326-31.
doi: 10.1128/am.23.2.326-331.1972.

Use of shake cultures in a semisolid thioglycolate medium for differentiating staphylococci from micrococci

Use of shake cultures in a semisolid thioglycolate medium for differentiating staphylococci from micrococci

J B Evans et al. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Feb.

Abstract

The standard diagnostic test for differentiating staphylococci from micrococci is based on the ability of the former to produce acid anaerobically in a glucose-containing growth medium. This test has been modified to provide greater convenience, easier interpretation of results, and better correlation with deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) base composition. In the modified test, shake cultures in Brewer's fluid thioglycolate medium with 0.3% agar added are observed for growth in the anaerobic zone of the tubes. This test was applied to 125 strains of staphylococci and micrococci, and all except two strains gave results that were consistent with other criteria. Of particular interest were eight strains of Micrococcus saprophyticus and three strains of M. lactis that have a DNA composition of 30 to 37% guanine plus cytosine (GC). All 11 of these cultures produced anaerobic growth and thus would be classified as staphylococci. Strains of M. lactis that have a high GC content in their DNA grew only aerobically. Some cultures of staphylococci produced characteristic band patterns of anaerobic growth and other cultures produced only a few anaerobic colonies from an inoculum of 10(6) to 10(7) cells. These observations suggest some interesting genetic and metabolic capabilities in such cultures.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Gen Microbiol. 1966 Aug;44(2):281-92 - PubMed
    1. J Bacteriol. 1968 Mar;95(3):739-43 - PubMed
    1. J Gen Microbiol. 1963 Sep;32:375-84 - PubMed
    1. J Bacteriol. 1964 Sep;88:804-5 - PubMed
    1. J Gen Microbiol. 1965 Mar;38:363-87 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources