Double-blind trial to compare ampicillin, cephalexin, co-trimoxazole, and trimethoprim in treatment of urinary infection
- PMID: 4555654
- PMCID: PMC1788903
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.5815.673
Double-blind trial to compare ampicillin, cephalexin, co-trimoxazole, and trimethoprim in treatment of urinary infection
Abstract
In order to test their value in urinary infection a double-blind trial was carried out using ampicillin, cephalexin, trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (co-trimoxazole), and trimethoprim. Eighty-three courses of treatment were given to hospital patients, 149 to pregnant women, and 107 to patients with dysuria and frequency seen in domiciliary practice. Thus infections of varying severity in defined groups of patients caused by organisms with different antibiotic sensitivities were treated.Analysis of the overall results (339 courses) was compared with those from the individual groups and considerable variation in response was found. In domiciliary infections and bacteriuria in pregnancy trimethoprim alone proved to be at least as effective as the other three compounds and caused fewer than half the number of side effects. In the hospital patients co-trimoxazole was superior to trimethoprim.The overall results for ampicillin and cephalexin were similar although cephalexin proved to be inferior in treating symptomatic domiciliary infections.
Similar articles
-
Trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole in the treatment of urinary infection.Med J Aust. 1973 Jun 30;1(2):Suppl:44-8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1973.tb111187.x. Med J Aust. 1973. PMID: 4580586 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
-
Co-trimoxazole and cephalexin. A clinical trial in urinary tract infections in children with spina bifida cystica.Dev Med Child Neurol. 1972 Jun;14(3):342-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1972.tb02600.x. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1972. PMID: 4556017 No abstract available.
-
Double-blind trial comparing trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (Bactrim) with ampicillin in treating urinary infections.Med J Aust. 1972 Feb 26;1(9):442. Med J Aust. 1972. PMID: 4554238 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
-
Trimethoprim--sulphamethoxazole: comparative study in urinary infection in hospital.Br Med J. 1969 Mar 1;1(5643):541-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5643.541. Br Med J. 1969. PMID: 4885025 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The use of trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole in urinary tract infections in domiciliary practice.Med J Aust. 1973 Mar 17;1(11):536-8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1973.tb110545.x. Med J Aust. 1973. PMID: 4266987 No abstract available.
Cited by
-
The paradox of using a 7 day antibacterial course to treat urinary tract infections in the community.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1988 Oct;26(4):391-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1988.tb03396.x. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1988. PMID: 3190989 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Failure to demonstrate an advantage in combining sulphamethoxazole with trimethoprim in an experimental model of urinary infection.J Clin Pathol. 1974 Aug;27(8):619-22. doi: 10.1136/jcp.27.8.619. J Clin Pathol. 1974. PMID: 4425219 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections with trimethoprim versus sulfisoxazole, with special reference to antibody-coated bacteria and fecal flora.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981 May;19(5):842-50. doi: 10.1128/AAC.19.5.842. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981. PMID: 7027925 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Single-dose and seven-day trimethoprim and co-trimoxazole in the treatment of urinary tract infection.J R Coll Gen Pract. 1983 Sep;33(254):585-9. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1983. PMID: 6605424 Free PMC article.
-
Antibacterial drugs today. I.Drugs. 1975;10(1):1-55. doi: 10.2165/00003495-197510010-00001. Drugs. 1975. PMID: 1100345 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources