Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1972 Aug;24(2):168-74.
doi: 10.1128/am.24.2.168-174.1972.

Enteric bacterial growth rates in river water

Enteric bacterial growth rates in river water

C W Hendricks. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Aug.

Abstract

Enteric bacteria, including stocked strains of pathogenic species and organisms naturally present in the stream, were capable of growth in a chemostat with autoclaved river water taken 750 m below a sewage outfall. Maximal specific growth rates for all organisms occurred at 30 C, whereas culture generation times ranged between 33.3 and 116 hr. Of the six laboratory strains of enteric species used, Escherichia coli and Enterobacter aerogenes grew at generation times of 34.5 and 33.3 hr, respectively, while the remaining Proteus, Arizona, Salmonella, and Shigella spp. reproduced at a rate two to three times slower than the coliforms. Little or no growth occurred in the water at incubation temperatures of 20 and 5 C, and death was observed for Salmonella senftenberg at 20 and 5 C and for E. aerogenes and Proteus rettgeri at 5 C. When enteric bacteria naturally present in the river water were employed in similar experiments, coliform bacteria demonstrated a generation time of approximately 116 hr, whereas fecal coliforms failed to grow. Growth of the bacteria from the river demonstrated a periodicity of approximately 100 hr, which suggests that much of the growth of these organisms in the chemostat may be on the glass surfaces. This phenomenon, however, was not observed with any of the stocked enteric species. Neither the stock cultures nor the aquatic strains were capable of growth in autoclaved river water taken above the sewage outfall at the three temperatures tested.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Bacteriol. 1962 Apr;83(4):844-50 - PubMed
    1. Appl Microbiol. 1971 Dec;22(6):1048-54 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1948 Mar 5;107(2775):254-5 - PubMed
    1. J Bacteriol. 1969 Jul;99(1):156-60 - PubMed
    1. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1955;9:97-110 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources