Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1974 May;27(5):912-6.
doi: 10.1128/am.27.5.912-916.1974.

Isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis by use of 5-iodo-2-deoxyuridine-treated cells

Comparative Study

Isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis by use of 5-iodo-2-deoxyuridine-treated cells

B B Wentworth et al. Appl Microbiol. 1974 May.

Abstract

Irradiated McCoy cells have provided a useful technique for the isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis strains, among which are found the etiological agents of trachoma, inclusion conjunctivitis, and lymphogranuloma venereum. Because irradiation is not always readily available, 5-iodo-2-deoxyuridine (IUDR) treatment of cells was investigated as a substitute procedure. IUDR-treated cells were found to be as sensitive to C. trachomatis infection as were irradiated McCoy cells. Stock chlamydial strains gave similar titers of iodine-stained inclusions in either system. When cells treated with IUDR were compared with irradiated cells for the isolation of C. trachomatis from clinical specimens, 5 of 138 specimens yielded isolates in IUDR-treated cells not found in irradiated ones, and one isolate was obtained from irradiated but not from IUDR-treated cells. In those 56 cases where inclusions were seen in both systems, there were significantly more inclusions in IUDR-treated than in irradiated cells. Although this series of cultures is too small to determine whether IUDR-treated cells are superior to irradiated ones for the isolation of C. trachomatis, the data indicate that IUDR treatment is at least equally effective.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Infect Dis. 1969 Oct;120(4):451-62 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Jan;69(1):83-5 - PubMed
    1. Appl Microbiol. 1972 Jan;23(1):123-9 - PubMed
    1. J Bacteriol. 1972 May;110(2):706-21 - PubMed
    1. Br J Vener Dis. 1972 Dec;48(6):425-8 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources