Similar articles

• [Technetium polyphosphate and technetium diphosphonate. A comparative study].

  Henne W, Pixberg HU, Pfannenstiel P. Henne W, et al. Nucl Med (Stuttg). 1975 Jun 30;14(2):83-90. Nucl Med (Stuttg). 1975. PMID: 1178518 German.
• Clinical evaluation of 99mTc-labeled monofluorophosphate: a comparison with ethane-hydroxy-diphosphonate.

  Citrin DL, Bessent RG, Greig WR. Citrin DL, et al. J Nucl Med. 1974 Dec;15(12):1110-2. J Nucl Med. 1974. PMID: 4427134 No abstract available.
• Clinical comparison of the kinetics of 99mTc-labeled polyphosphate and diphosphonate.

  Krishnamurthy GT, Tubis M, Endow JS, Singhi V, Walsh CF, Blahd WH. Krishnamurthy GT, et al. J Nucl Med. 1974 Oct;15(10):848-55. J Nucl Med. 1974. PMID: 4608282 Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
• Technetium-99m labeled agents for skeletal imaging.

  Thrall JH. Thrall JH. CRC Crit Rev Clin Radiol Nucl Med. 1976;8(1):1-31. CRC Crit Rev Clin Radiol Nucl Med. 1976. PMID: 789010 Review.
• Bone scanning in evaluation of Paget's disease of bone.

  Shirazi PH, Ryan WG, Fordham EW. Shirazi PH, et al. CRC Crit Rev Clin Radiol Nucl Med. 1974 Oct;5(4):523-58. CRC Crit Rev Clin Radiol Nucl Med. 1974. PMID: 4279805 Review. No abstract available.