Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1972 May;110(2):661-6.
doi: 10.1128/jb.110.2.661-666.1972.

Comparison of deoxyribonucleic acid uptake and marker integration in bacilli and protoplasts of Bacillus subtilis

Comparison of deoxyribonucleic acid uptake and marker integration in bacilli and protoplasts of Bacillus subtilis

I L Miller et al. J Bacteriol. 1972 May.

Abstract

trp(+)his(-) donor deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was added to highly competent trp(-)his(+) recipient bacilli and to protoplasts prepared from these bacilli, and the cell-DNA complexes were incubated for 30 min. The complexes were then washed and lysed, and their DNA was analyzed on a trp(-)his(-) strain for the donor marker trp(+), the resident marker his(+), and for the recombinant trp(+)his(+) combination. The extracts of the bacillary complexes contained a normal percentage of donor markers (0.1-0.2%), and the number of trp(+)his(+) doubles (20% of all trp(+) transformants) indicated that the donor DNA had become integrated into the resident genomes. The protoplast complexes contained 10 to 1,000 times fewer donor markers and almost no recombinants. This indicated that, in protoplasts, marker uptake was minimal and recombination was absent. Uptake was also measured with (3)H-labeled DNA. On the average, protoplasts took up one-fiftieth as much DNA as bacilli. It was concluded that, probably, protoplasts took up no DNA at all, that there were no DNA affinity sites on the surface of the protoplasts, and that the residual marker and radioactivity uptake was due to imperfections in the experimental system. The data and conclusions differed sharply from earlier ones of Hirokawa and Ikeda despite the fact that the techniques of these authors were followed in repeat experiments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Bacteriol. 1963 Sep;86:392-400 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1960 Sep 17;187:1002-6 - PubMed
    1. J Bacteriol. 1969 Jan;97(1):42-51 - PubMed
    1. J Gen Microbiol. 1962 Nov;29:537-49 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1961 Jan 15;47:52-5 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources