Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1979 Aug;237(2):H159-67.
doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1979.237.2.H159.

Comparison of arterial wall mechanics in normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats

Comparative Study

Comparison of arterial wall mechanics in normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats

R H Cox. Am J Physiol. 1979 Aug.

Abstract

Segments of carotid artery from Wistar (NW), Kyoto Wistar (WKY), and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were used to compare mechanical properties and connective tissue composition. Pressure-diameter measurements were made under conditions of active (5 microgram/ml norepinephrine) and passive (0 mM Ca2+ and 2 mM EGTA) smooth muscle. Systolic blood pressures averaged NW, 121 +/- 3; WKY, 124 +/- 4; and SHR, 187 +/- 5 MMHg. Passive mechanics were stiffest in SHR and most compliant in NW arteries. No differences in collagen-elastin ratio were found but collagen + elastin was lowest in SHR and highest in NW carotids. These results are not consistent with current concepts of the contribution of connective tissue elements to passive mechanics. Maximum stress development was NW, 561 +/- 49; WKY, 735 +/- 50; and SHR, 944 +/- 79 X 10(3) dyn/cm2. Diameter reductions to NE at 100 mmHg were NW, 17.6 +/- 2.4%; WKY, 16.7 +/- 2.0%; and SHR, 24.8 +/- 2.4%. The former suggests different contractile protein contents or more efficient intercellular force coupling in SHR. The latter suggests a more effective contractile apparatus as a result of stiffer passive muscle elements and/or a relatively larger wall thickness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources