Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1975 Jan;78(1):165-79.

Interaction of contraceptive progestins and related compounds with the oestrogen receptor. Part II: Effect on (3H)oestradiol binding to the rat uterine receptor in vitro

  • PMID: 46681
Comparative Study

Interaction of contraceptive progestins and related compounds with the oestrogen receptor. Part II: Effect on (3H)oestradiol binding to the rat uterine receptor in vitro

J M van Kordelaar et al. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 1975 Jan.

Abstract

Incubation of the 105 000 times g supernatant of rat uterus homogenate with (3H)oestradiol resulted in an oestrogen specific binding of limited capacity to a macromolecule sedimenting in the 8-9S region after density gradient centrifugation. The contraceptive progestins of the 19-nortestosterone series were able to interfere with oestradiol binding in contrast to the hydroxyprogesterone derivatives chlormadinone, medroxyprogesterone and megestrol. The interaction appeared to be competitive. The strongest inhibition of oestradiol binding was observed in the presence of ethinodiol, followed by northinodrel, lynestrenol and norethindrone respectively. Norgestrel was almost inactive. Of the related structures tested oestrenol displayed more activity than norethindrone, nortestosterone and ethisterone were less active and 6alpha-methyllynestrenol showed only border line activity. In comparison with norethinodrel and norethindrone, lynestrenol and oestrenol appeared in vitro to be stronger competitors for oestradiol than in vivo (Part I; Van Kordelaar et al. 1975). This may be due to the great difference in lipophilic character, which is reflected in the RM values of these compounds. From the results obtained it may be concluded, that the presence of a 17alpha-ethynyl substituent promotes receptor binding, whereas the introduction of methyl substituents in the position 6, 10 and 18 causes the opposite effect. The relationship between the various ring A structures and the affinity to the receptor is discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms