Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1973 May;114(2):782-9.
doi: 10.1128/jb.114.2.782-789.1973.

Sodium and other inorganic growth requirements of bacteroides amylophilus

Sodium and other inorganic growth requirements of bacteroides amylophilus

D R Caldwell et al. J Bacteriol. 1973 May.

Abstract

Bacteroides amylophilus has growth requirements for Na(+), PO(4) (3-), K(+), and small quantities of Mg(2+). No requirement could be shown for Ca(2+) in media previously found growth-yield-limiting for Bacteroides succinogenes. Deletion of Co(2+), Mn(2+), Cl(-), or SO(4) (2-) did not affect growth. Quantitative studies indicate that Na(+), K(+), and PO(4) (3-) have differing effects on the growth of B. amylophilus. A concentration of sodium and potassium ions affects both growth rate and growth yield, whereas a phosphate concentration markedly affects growth yield, but affects growth rate only slightly, if at all. The sodium requirement of B. amylophilus is absolute. It cannot be replaced by K(+), Li(+), Rb(+), or Cs(+). The latter three monovalent cations are toxic to B. amylophilus if supplied to the organism at Na(+)-replacing concentrations. K(+) is inactive at similar concentrations. The K(+) requirement of B. amylophilus may be satisfied by Rb(+). The concentration of Na(+) required by B. amylophilus for abundant growth suggests that B. amylophilus should be considered a slightly halophilic organism. The results suggest that Na(+) may be a more frequent requirement among terrestial bacteria obtained from relatively low-salt environments than has been previously believed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1963 May;101:269-77 - PubMed
    1. Aust J Biol Sci. 1967 Feb;20(1):183-92 - PubMed
    1. J Gen Microbiol. 1962 Sep;29:69-81 - PubMed
    1. J Bacteriol. 1962 Oct;84:605-14 - PubMed
    1. Bacteriol Rev. 1965 Mar;29:9-24 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources