Clinical comparison between membrane and bubble oxygenators in cardiopulmonary bypass
- PMID: 479280
Clinical comparison between membrane and bubble oxygenators in cardiopulmonary bypass
Abstract
The clinical course of two similar patient groups was compared in whom, during cardiopulmonary bypass, a membrane or bubble oxygenator was employed. According to our results there is no significant functional difference between the two types of oxygenators as long as the perfusion time does not exceed 90 minutes. Beyond this time limit, the membrane oxygenator has distinct advantages, particularly with regard to hemolysis. We presently prefer the bubble oxygenator. The use of a membrane oxygenator is restricted to complex open heart procedures with suspected technical problems.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of bubble and membrane oxygenators in short and long perfusions.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1979 Nov;78(5):655-66. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1979. PMID: 491720
-
Comparative evaluation of a new disposable rotating membrane oxygenator with bubble oxygenator.Ann Thorac Surg. 1976 Jan;21(1):48-54. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)64887-4. Ann Thorac Surg. 1976. PMID: 2114
-
Deleterious effects of cardiopulmonary bypass. A prospective study of bubble versus membrane oxygenation.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985 Jun;89(6):888-99. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985. PMID: 3158783 Clinical Trial.
-
Development of the oxygenator: past, present, and future.J Artif Organs. 2004;7(3):111-20. doi: 10.1007/s10047-004-0268-6. J Artif Organs. 2004. PMID: 15558331 Review.
-
Membrane oxygenators: current developments in design and application.J Biomed Eng. 1988 Nov;10(6):541-7. doi: 10.1016/0141-5425(88)90113-6. J Biomed Eng. 1988. PMID: 3070171 Review.
Cited by
-
In vivo survival of red blood cells processed by a bubble or membrane oxygenator during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.Tex Heart Inst J. 1986 Jun;13(2):247-51. Tex Heart Inst J. 1986. PMID: 15227369 Free PMC article.