This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

. 1974 Jul;3(4):381-8.

doi: 10.1007/BF01636445.

Measurements of change in penile dimensions

PMID: 4836818
DOI: 10.1007/BF01636445

Measurements of change in penile dimensions

N McConaghy. Arch Sex Behav. 1974 Jul.

. 1974 Jul;3(4):381-8.

doi: 10.1007/BF01636445.

Author

PMID: 4836818
DOI: 10.1007/BF01636445

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

The use of penile plethysmography in a medicolegal evaluation.
Rosen RC. Rosen RC. J Forensic Sci. 1977 Oct;22(4):791-4. J Forensic Sci. 1977. PMID: 618005 No abstract available.
Erect penile length and circumference dimensions of 1,661 sexually active men in the United States.
Herbenick D, Reece M, Schick V, Sanders SA. Herbenick D, et al. J Sex Med. 2014 Jan;11(1):93-101. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12244. Epub 2013 Jul 10. J Sex Med. 2014. PMID: 23841855
[Penile dimensions in type 2 diabetes].
Belousov II, Kogan MI, Ibishev HS, Vorobyev SV, Khripun IA, Gusova ZR. Belousov II, et al. Urologiia. 2015 Dec;(6):82-86. Urologiia. 2015. PMID: 28247685 Russian.
MR imaging of the penis.
Pretorius ES, Siegelman ES, Ramchandani P, Banner MP. Pretorius ES, et al. Radiographics. 2001 Oct;21 Spec No:S283-98; discussion S298-9. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.21.suppl_1.g01oc24s283. Radiographics. 2001. PMID: 11598264 Review.
Penile size and penile enlargement surgery: a review.
Dillon BE, Chama NB, Honig SC. Dillon BE, et al. Int J Impot Res. 2008 Nov-Dec;20(6):519-29. doi: 10.1038/ijir.2008.14. Epub 2008 May 22. Int J Impot Res. 2008. PMID: 18496548 Review.

See all similar articles

Cited by

Autonomic responses of transsexual and homosexual males to erotic film sequences.
Barr R, Blaszczynski A. Barr R, et al. Arch Sex Behav. 1976 May;5(3):211-22. doi: 10.1007/BF01541372. Arch Sex Behav. 1976. PMID: 952606
The use of penile tumescence measures with incarcerated rapists: further validity issues.
Murphy WD, Krisak J, Stalgaitis S, Anderson K. Murphy WD, et al. Arch Sex Behav. 1984 Dec;13(6):545-54. doi: 10.1007/BF01542089. Arch Sex Behav. 1984. PMID: 6517687
A comparison of the measurement characteristics of two circumferential penile transducers.
Laws DR. Laws DR. Arch Sex Behav. 1977 Jan;6(1):45-51. doi: 10.1007/BF01579247. Arch Sex Behav. 1977. PMID: 836143
Validity and ethics of penile circumference measures of sexual arousal: a critical review.
McConaghy N. McConaghy N. Arch Sex Behav. 1989 Aug;18(4):357-69. doi: 10.1007/BF01541954. Arch Sex Behav. 1989. PMID: 2673137 Review.
Validity and ethics of penile circumference measures of sexual arousal: a reply to McConaghy.
McAnulty RD, Adams HE. McAnulty RD, et al. Arch Sex Behav. 1992 Apr;21(2):177-86; discussion 187-95. doi: 10.1007/BF01542592. Arch Sex Behav. 1992. PMID: 1580788

See all "Cited by" articles

References

1. Br J Psychiatry. 1967 Jul;113(500):711-29 - PubMed
1. Behav Res Ther. 1967 Feb;5(1):43-8 - PubMed
1. Arch Sex Behav. 1971 Dec;1(4):309-20 - PubMed
1. Behav Res Ther. 1966 Aug;4(3):239-41 - PubMed
1. Behav Res Ther. 1963 May;1:85-93 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions