Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1967;36(6):871-83.

Antibiotic therapy of cholera

Clinical Trial

Antibiotic therapy of cholera

J Lindenbaum et al. Bull World Health Organ. 1967.

Abstract

Recent clinical trials having established the value of tetracycline as an adjunct to fluid and electrolyte replacement in cholera treatment, a controlled trial of antibiotic therapy was conducted in Dacca on 318 adults hospitalized for cholera. The effects of 4 antibiotics orally administered in varying dosage schedules were studied.Cholera therapy with tetracycline or chloramphenicol caused a highly significant reduction in the duration of diarrhoea and of positive culture, in stool volume, and in intravenous fluid requirement as compared with the results in controls who received intravenous fluid therapy only. Streptomycin was also effective, but to a lesser degree; paromomycin was of little value.The severity of dehydration on admission was significantly related to subsequent duration of diarrhoea regardless of whether antibiotics were given. Increasing age was associated with more prolonged purging in patients receiving antibiotics.Increasing the dose of tetracycline to 2 to 3 times that usually administered, or prolonging treatment from 2 to 4 days, did not enhance the therapeutic results. The effect of tetracycline was apparent within a few hours of administration. Bacteriological relapses were seen after discontinuation of therapy in all treatment groups, but were not due to the development of resistant bacteria.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lancet. 1965 Oct 30;2(7418):909-10 - PubMed
    1. J Philipp Med Assoc. 1965 Nov;41(11):763-9 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1966 May 14;1(7446):1066-8 - PubMed
    1. Bull World Health Organ. 1966;34(3):363-9 - PubMed
    1. Am J Med Sci. 1951 Oct;222(4):396-403 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources