Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1979 May;20(5):131-5.

The effect of retained placenta and metritis complex on reproductive performance in dairy cattle -- a case control study

The effect of retained placenta and metritis complex on reproductive performance in dairy cattle -- a case control study

W C Sandals et al. Can Vet J. 1979 May.

Abstract

A study of the computer stored records of 293 dairy cows and 652 calvings reveals the effects of retained placenta and metritis complex on reproductive performance. The overall incidence rate of retained placenta was 11.2%. Retained placenta was 4.6 times more likely to occur following twin births than following single births. Most cases of retained placenta occurred during the fall. Forty-five percent of that seasonal increase was explained by an increased number of calvings. Metritis complex was diagnosed following 54.8% of retained placenta cases. Retained placenta alone did not significantly impair reproductive performance. Metritis complex, in the presence or absence of retained placenta, caused a significant (P</=0.05) increase in days open, services per conception, calving to first heat intervals and days from calving to first service. There is an indication (interaction P</=0.1) that cows with both retained placenta and metritis complex are more severely affected than cows with either retained placenta or metritis complex alone. The influence of retained placenta on fertility appears to depend on the proportion of cows with retained placenta that have metritis complex.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Cornell Vet. 1968 Apr;58(2):185-92 - PubMed
    1. Zentralbl Veterinarmed A. 1977 Sep;24(7):529-41 - PubMed
    1. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1958 Nov 15;133(10):489-96 - PubMed
    1. N Z Vet J. 1967 Jul;15(7):111-6 - PubMed
    1. Can J Comp Med. 1978 Jan;42(1):1-9 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources