Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1968 Aug 3;3(5613):277-80.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5613.277.

Controlled comparison of tetracycline and furazolidone in cholera

Clinical Trial

Controlled comparison of tetracycline and furazolidone in cholera

N F Pierce et al. Br Med J. .

Abstract

A controlled comparison of furazolidone and tetracycline in the treatment of cholera indicates that, in either dosage used, furazolidone reduced total stool volume by 50% and duration of diarrhoea by 40%. These results are comparable to those achieved with tetracycline, which was given in presently recommended dosage. Both furazolidone and tetracycline significantly reduced the rate of stool output within 18 to 24 hours of starting antibiotic treatment. Furazolidone was significantly less effective than tetracycline in rapidly and consistently terminating vibrio excretion. One convalescent carrier of cholera vibrios was identified among control patients; none was identified among patients treated with either tetracycline or furazolidone. All Vibrio cholerae strains tested were sensitive to tetracycline and furazolidone, but larger concentrations of the latter were required to achieve inhibition of growth. It is concluded that tetracycline remains the antibiotic of choice in cholera but that furazolidone would be a useful adjunct to cholera therapy when tetracycline is unobtainable or if strains of V. cholerae with clinically significant resistance to tetracycline should be encountered.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bull Calcutta Sch Trop Med. 1965 Apr;13(2):40-2 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1965 Oct 30;2(7418):909-10 - PubMed
    1. Bull World Health Organ. 1966;34(3):363-9 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1967 Apr 22;1(7495):865-8 - PubMed
    1. Bull World Health Organ. 1967;36(6):871-83 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources