Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1968 Sep;16(9):1383-6.
doi: 10.1128/am.16.9.1383-1386.1968.

Isolation of shigellae. V. Comparison of enrichment broths with stools

Isolation of shigellae. V. Comparison of enrichment broths with stools

W I Taylor et al. Appl Microbiol. 1968 Sep.

Abstract

Many enteric media are more efficient for the detection of salmonellae than of shigellae. Comparisons of three enrichment broths and three plating media were made during analysis of 1,405 stool specimens to choose a combination of media which would enhance detection of shigellae as well. Gram-Negative (GN), Selenite, and Silliker's Broths were streaked to E M B, Salmonella-Shigella (SS), and xylose lysine deoxycholate (XLD) Agars. The enrichment broths produced a twofold increase in isolations of both salmonellae and shigellae over direct streaking. All three broths performed equally well for Salmonella detection, but GN and Silliker's produced twice as many Shigella isolates as did Selenite. Comparison of the plating media showed that XLD was markedly more efficient than either E M B or SS Agar for the recovery of both genera. SS Agar was superior to E M B for isolation of salmonellae after enrichment, whereas E M B was better for isolation of shigellae by direct streaking. Both E M B and SS were more effective when used after GN and Silliker's than after Selenite. GN Broth and XLD Agar were the most efficient combination of media. During these analyses, 158 salmonellae and 49 shigellae isolates were obtained.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Clin Pathol. 1965 Oct;44(4):471-5 - PubMed
    1. Am J Clin Pathol. 1965 Oct;44(4):476-9 - PubMed
    1. Bull Soc Pathol Exot Filiales. 1966 Jan-Feb;59(1):31-42 - PubMed
    1. Appl Microbiol. 1964 Mar;12:100-5 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources