Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1979 Aug;20(8):722-9.
doi: 10.1136/gut.20.8.722.

Water-holding by dietary fibre in vitro and its relationship to faecal output in man

Comparative Study

Water-holding by dietary fibre in vitro and its relationship to faecal output in man

A M Stephen et al. Gut. 1979 Aug.

Abstract

The in vitro water-holding properties of 17 dietary fibre preparations, mainly food materials, bulk laxatives, and gel-forming polysaccharides, have been measured. Water uptake was measured by a centrifugation technique and also by a new method using sacs of dialysis tubing containing the material, immersed in simulated gut contents. The centrifugation technique could not be applied to gel-forming polysaccharides but the methods gave broadly similar results for other materials (r=0.85). The gel-forming polysaccharides in general held more water than the food fibres. Studies of matched pairs of materials which differed only slightly in chemical composition suggested that the presence of charged groups on the molecule encouraged water uptake. In the food materials water uptake was related to uronic acid content (r=0.87). Materials ground to a smaller particle size increase their water holding but this effect was small (+28%). The hypothesis that dietary fibre increases faecal bulk by virtue of its ability to hold water was tested by comparing the in vitro water-holding capacity of eight of the fibres with the changes they had produced when fed to human volunteers under controlled conditions. Of these materials pectin had the greatest water-holding capacity (56.2 g water/g material) but produced the smallest change in faecal weight (19%), while bran had the lowest water-holding (4.2 g/g) and the largest faecal weight changes (117%). Overall an inverse relationship (r=0.88) between water-holding and faecal bulking was found, suggesting that dietary fibre does not exert its effect on faecal weight simply by retaining water in the gut.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clin Sci. 1965 Apr;28:357-75 - PubMed
    1. J Am Pharm Assoc Am Pharm Assoc. 1955 Apr;44(4):237-41 - PubMed
    1. Am J Dig Dis. 1953 Feb;20(2):39-42 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1978 Jan 7;1(8054):5-9 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1976 Aug 21;2(7982):394-6 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources