Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1969 Sep;18(3):452-7.
doi: 10.1128/am.18.3.452-457.1969.

Comparative study of the efficacy of seven paper-reagent strips and conventional biochemical tests in identifying gram-negative organisms

Comparative Study

Comparative study of the efficacy of seven paper-reagent strips and conventional biochemical tests in identifying gram-negative organisms

J M Matsen et al. Appl Microbiol. 1969 Sep.

Abstract

Gram-nagative organisms were tested with commercially available reagentimpregnated strips (PATHO-TEC). Of the 291 strains, all were tested by using seven paper tests and their conventional counterparts. Excellent correlation was obtained with the oxidase, phenylalanine-deaminase, and Voges-Proskauer tests. Indole tests made on liquid medium cultures also gave complete correlation, but some false-negative results with indole-positive Proteus strains were obtained when growth from solid medium was tested by the strip method. Paper strip urease tests were positive within 2 hr with all Klebsiella and some Serratia, Herellea, and Citrobacter strains as well as with Proteus strains. Approximately 15% of citrate strip test results differed from those of the conventional tests, and reproducibility was poor on retest. The lysine decarboxylase strip test showed a number of discrepancies and posed problems of interpretation and readability. Paper reagent strip methods are simple and convenient and merit further development to increase the specificity of those which depend on pH change up to that achieved with the Voges-Proskauer, oxidase, phenylalanine, and indole methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Clin Pathol. 1968 Apr;49(4):494-9 - PubMed
    1. Am J Med Technol. 1968 May;34(5):271-86 - PubMed
    1. J Bacteriol. 1955 Aug;70(2):187-91 - PubMed
    1. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1967;33(2):184-8 - PubMed
    1. J Gen Microbiol. 1965 Nov;41(2):169-74 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources