Sensitivity of mammography and physical examination of the breast for detecting breast cancer
- PMID: 490787
Sensitivity of mammography and physical examination of the breast for detecting breast cancer
Abstract
Mammography and physical examination of the breast are evaluated as screening instruments for detecting breast cancer based on local biopsy data obtained from women enrolled in a national breast cancer screening program. One hundren thirteen cancers (15.5%) of women who underwent biopsy) were detected. The individual sensitivities of mammography and physical examination for detecting breast cancer are 62% and 24%, respectively. The sensitivity of the two methods combined is 75% (85 of 113). Thirty-seven cancers were in situ or minimally invasive (less than or equal to 1 cm in greatest dimension). Eighty-one percent (30 of 37) of these small cancers were detected by screening, and they comprised 35% (30 of 85) of all cancers detected by mammography, physical examination, or both. Improved survival is anticipated due to this high rate of discovery of small cancers.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.Radiology. 2002 Oct;225(1):165-75. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2251011667. Radiology. 2002. PMID: 12355001
-
Comparison of breast mammography, sonography and physical examination for screening women at high risk of breast cancer in taiwan.Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002 Apr;28(4):415-20. doi: 10.1016/s0301-5629(02)00483-0. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002. PMID: 12049952
-
Advantages and limitations of physical examination and mammography in breast cancer screening.Cancer Detect Prev. 1981;4(1-4):553-63. Cancer Detect Prev. 1981. PMID: 7349821
-
[Characteristics of screening-detected breast cancer and trends in its therapy].Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1998 Aug;25(10):1493-8. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1998. PMID: 9725039 Review. Japanese.
-
Mammography versus clinical examination of the breasts.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997;(22):125-9. doi: 10.1093/jncimono/1997.22.125. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997. PMID: 9709288 Review.
Cited by
-
Estimating the sensitivity of breast cancer screening--experience with the Honolulu BCDDP data.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1991 May;18 Suppl 1:S97-101. doi: 10.1007/BF02633538. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1991. PMID: 1873566
-
Physical diagnosis versus modern technology. A review.West J Med. 1990 Apr;152(4):377-82. West J Med. 1990. PMID: 2190412 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Screening for breast cancer: current attitudes and practice.Can Fam Physician. 1989 Apr;35:769-72. Can Fam Physician. 1989. PMID: 21249022 Free PMC article.
-
The role of the obstetrician-gynecologist in the management of breast lesions.J Natl Med Assoc. 1983 Aug;75(8):783-92. J Natl Med Assoc. 1983. PMID: 6631987 Free PMC article.
-
Mammography in screening for breast cancer: a viewpoint.Can Fam Physician. 1982 Mar;28:507-10. Can Fam Physician. 1982. PMID: 21286080 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources