Central retinal artery spasm
- PMID: 496181
Central retinal artery spasm
Abstract
Central retinal artery spasm, a seldom witnessed ocular sign, has been recognized in one eye of a patient complaining of transient monocular blindness. Removal of an ulcerative atheromatous plaque of the carotid artery on the same side as the eye with central retinal artery spasm resulted in complete disappearance of symptoms. No other signs of ocular pathology were noted in addition to the central retinal artery spasm. Central retinal artery spasm occurring in both eyes simultaneously may be the mechanism explaining the visual loss of amaurosis fugax. Physiologic mechanisms associating brief episodes of monocular blindness and carotid artery obstructive disease with atherosclerosis are discussed. The possibility of central retinal artery spasm initiating occlusion of the same vessel is mentioned.
Similar articles
-
Retinal arteriolar spasm during transient monocular visual loss in eosinophilic vasculitis.J Neuroophthalmol. 2009 Mar;29(1):58-61. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0b013e3181989ba8. J Neuroophthalmol. 2009. PMID: 19458579
-
[A case of amaurosis fugax with anomalous origin of the ophthalmic artery and atheromatous stenosis of the external carotid artery].No Shinkei Geka. 1984 Mar;12(3 Suppl):377-81. No Shinkei Geka. 1984. PMID: 6462346 Japanese.
-
Atherosclerotic carotid disease and the eye.Neurol Clin. 1991 Feb;9(1):131-45. Neurol Clin. 1991. PMID: 2011106 Review.
-
Symptoms of amaurosis fugax in atherosclerotic carotid artery disease.Neurology. 1987 May;37(5):829-32. doi: 10.1212/wnl.37.5.829. Neurology. 1987. PMID: 3574686
-
Prevalent misconceptions about acute retinal vascular occlusive disorders.Prog Retin Eye Res. 2005 Jul;24(4):493-519. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2004.12.001. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2005. PMID: 15845346 Review.
Cited by
-
Patterns of non-embolic transient monocular visual field loss.J Neurol. 2013 Jul;260(7):1889-900. doi: 10.1007/s00415-013-6902-6. Epub 2013 Apr 6. J Neurol. 2013. PMID: 23564298
-
Transient monocular blindness: the controversial role of the ophthalmic artery--response to Rutgers et al. in J Neurol (2003) 250:501-502.J Neurol. 2004 Jul;251(7):882-3; author reply 884. doi: 10.1007/s00415-004-0416-1. J Neurol. 2004. PMID: 15258794 No abstract available.