Cardiac and pulmonary effects of acebutolol

Abstract

In a double-blind randomised study, single intravenous doses of propranolol (0-1 mg. per kg.), practolol (1 mg. per kg.), acebutolol (1 mg. per kg.), or placebo were each administered at weekly intervals to six healthy volunteers. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (F.E.V.1), resting and exercise heart-rate, and resting and exercise peak flow-rate (P.F.R.) were determined before and at 2, 3, 4, and 6 hours after each treatment. Venous blood-samples were also obtained at these times. Compared with placebo, resting heart-rate was reduced after all three drugs, but the corresponding differences in exercise heart-rate were much greater, more consistent, and of greater statistical significance. At 2, 3, and 4 hours when acebutolol and propranolol produced equivalent cardiac beta-blocking activity (judged by reductions in exercise heart-rate), their mean plasma concentratios were in the ratio of about 8/1; and at 2 hours when practolol and acebutolol gave rise to almost equivalent cardiac beta blockade, their mean plasma concentratio ration was 3/1. At times, reductions in F.E.V.1 and resting P.F.R. after propranolol (but not after practolol or acebutolol) were significantly greater than the corresponding changes after placebo. The reductions in exercies P.F.R. after propranolol (6 hours) and acebutolol (4 hours) (but not after practolol) were significantly greater than the changes after placebo. Changes in F.E.V.1, resting and exercise P.F.R. after propranolol, and the corresponding changes after practolol, were significantly different, all of which confirmed that practolol was more cardioselective than propranolo. In general, the reductions in F.E.V.1 and resting P.F.R. after acebutolol were slightly smaller than after propranolol, excepting at 6 hours when the difference between them was significant. The reductions in exercise P;F.R. after acebutolol and propranolol were of the same order, there being no significant differences between the two, whereas the reductions after acebutolol were clearly greater than the corresponding changes after practolol, the differences being significant at 2, 3, and 4 hours.