Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1970 Apr;19(4):629-37.
doi: 10.1128/am.19.4.629-637.1970.

Effect of pH of medium and size of inoculum on activity of antibiotics against group D Streptococcus (Enterococcus)

Effect of pH of medium and size of inoculum on activity of antibiotics against group D Streptococcus (Enterococcus)

P Toala et al. Appl Microbiol. 1970 Apr.

Abstract

Seventy-one clinical isolates of 5 species of group D Streptococcus (Enterococcus) were tested for susceptibility to 15 antibiotics at pH 5.0, 7.4, and 8.5. Penicillin G, ampicillin, cephalothin, cephaloridine, and novobiocin were considerably more active against all strains at pH 5.0 than in the more alkaline media. On the other hand, lincomycin, clindimycin, erythromycin, and gentamicin were moderately to markedly more active at pH 8.5. No important differences were noted in the susceptibility of the strains to kanamycin and streptomycin, at the pH levels tested, but the organisms were quite resistant to them in these tests. The various species differed quantitatively in their susceptibility to the individual drugs and in the effects of pH. The size of the inoculum also had a variable effect on susceptibility, depending on the species of Enterococcus, the antibiotics, and the pH of the test medium. The data suggest that, in the antibiotic treatment of urinary tract infections caused by Enterococcus, attempts should be made to achieve the optimum pH in the urine, particularly in view of the fact that organisms of this group are often resistant to several antibiotics in the usual tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Med Sci. 1969 Dec;258(6):416-30 - PubMed
    1. J Lab Clin Med. 1968 Dec;72(6):916-23 - PubMed
    1. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1952 Oct;81(1):188-93 - PubMed
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (Bethesda). 1967;7:210-7 - PubMed
    1. Appl Microbiol. 1968 Sep;16(9):1288-92 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources