Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1971;45(4):465-71.

Serological diagnosis of human influenza infections by immunoprecipitin techniques

Comparative Study

Serological diagnosis of human influenza infections by immunoprecipitin techniques

G C Schild et al. Bull World Health Organ. 1971.

Abstract

In immunodiffusion tests employing disrupted influenza virus (A2/Hong King/68, X-31 strain) as antigen, precipitin lines corresponding to three virus antigens can be distinguished-namely, the ribonucleoprotein, the haemagglutinin, and the neuraminidase. In the present study a comparison was made of such immunodiffusion tests and conventional diagnostic methods (complement-fixation and haemagglutination-inhibition tests) for serological diagnosis of A2/Hong Kong/68 infections in man. Precipitin tests in which the acquisition or reinforcement of precipitins for A2/Hong Kong/68 virus were detected, were found to be as sensitive as conventional methods for the serological diagnosis of influenza. In convalescent human sera precipitin lines corresponding to influenza A ribonucleoprotein were frequently detected, lines corresponding to A2 neuraminidase were less frequent, and those corresponding to haemagglutinin were least frequent. Precipitin tests had considerable advantages over other methods of serological diagnosis of influenza. They were rapid and simple to perform and were not susceptible to the effects of nonspecific reactions. In addition the antibody response to each of three antigens of the influenza virus could be detected in a single test system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Virology. 1966 Sep;30(1):104-15 - PubMed
    1. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1966 Jun;21:137-64 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1968 Dec 28;2(7583):1384-6 - PubMed
    1. J Gen Virol. 1969 Apr;4(3):355-63 - PubMed
    1. J Hyg (Lond). 1969 Jun;67(2):353-65 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources