Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality
- PMID: 503167
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJM197912203012503
Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality
Abstract
This study examines mortality rates for 12 surgical procedures of varying complexity in 1498 hospitals to determine whether there is a relation between a hospital's surgical volume and its surgical mortality. The mortality of open-heart surgery, vascular surgery, transurethral resection of the prostate, and coronary bypass decreased with increasing number of operations. Hospitals in which 200 or more of these operations were done annually had death rates, adjusted for case mix, 25 to 41 per cent lower than hospitals with lower volumes. For other procedures, the mortality curve flattened at lower volumes. For example, hospitals doing 50 to 100 total hip replacements attained a mortality rate for this procedure almost as low as that of hospitals doing 200 or more. Some procedures, such as cholecystectomy, showed no relation between volume and mortality. The results may reflect the effect of volume or experience on mortality, or referrals to institutions with better outcomes, as well as a number of other factors, such as patient selection. Regardless of the explanation, these data support the value of regionalization for certain operations.
Comment in
-
Hospital volume-outcome relationship in vulvar cancer treatment: a Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study.J Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Mar;32(2):e24. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e24. Epub 2021 Jan 13. J Gynecol Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33470066 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources