Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1971 Sep;50(3):652-68.
doi: 10.1083/jcb.50.3.652.

Primitive erythropoiesis in early chick embryogenesis. I. Cell cycle kinetics and the control of cell division

Primitive erythropoiesis in early chick embryogenesis. I. Cell cycle kinetics and the control of cell division

H Weintraub et al. J Cell Biol. 1971 Sep.

Abstract

The primitive line of embryonic chick blood cells develop as a relatively homogeneous cohort of cells. Using an analysis based on the continuous uptake of thymidine-(3)H, we have established the generation time, G1, S, and G2 for progressively more mature generations of these immature erythroblasts. The data indicate that after the initiation of hemoglobin synthesis, the average cell will yield six generations of hemoglobin producing erythroblasts. The older generations of erythroblasts exhibit a longer generation time, G1, S, and G2 than the earlier generations of erythroblasts. Other methods of analysis corroborated these findings. One of these methods, an estimate of total erythrocyte productivity from the primitive stem cells (hematocytoblasts), led to the conclusion that the erythroblast cell lineage might be initiated as early as the sixth or seventh division following fertilization. In addition, primitive erythroblasts characterized by one set of cell cycle parameters, when grown in serum associated with erythroblasts of different parameters, showed no alteration in mitotic behavior. These results suggest the presence of programmed cell division not immediately cued by extracellular influence.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Cell Biol. 1967 Feb;32(2):309-23 - PubMed
    1. Exp Cell Res. 1965 Aug;39(1):286-9 - PubMed
    1. Exp Cell Res. 1965 Sep;39(2):386-99 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1966 Feb 25;151(3713):992-5 - PubMed
    1. J Histochem Cytochem. 1965 Nov-Dec;13(8):726-39 - PubMed