Similar articles

• Experience of a continuing mass screening programme. Screening and re-screening for cervical carcinoma in Turku.

  Grönroos M, Tyrkkö J, Järvi O, Rauramo L. Grönroos M, et al. Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn. 1974;63(6):470-8. Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn. 1974. PMID: 4441027 No abstract available.
• [Results of the Leiden mass screening for cervix uteri carcinoma; the 'young' (24-34 years) versus the 'old' (35-54 years) group of women].

  Boon ME, de Graaff Guilloud-Gentenaar JC, Beck S. Boon ME, et al. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1990 Aug 11;134(32):1545-9. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1990. PMID: 2392176 Dutch.
• [Increase of in-situ cervix uteri carcinoma in women under 35; data analysis from family practice 1974-1986].

  Boon ME, Rietveld WJ, de Graaff Guilloud JC. Boon ME, et al. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1988 Jul 2;132(27):1240-3. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1988. PMID: 2840584 Dutch. No abstract available.
• Cervical cancer screening programs. I. Epidemiology and natural history of carcinoma of the cervix.

  [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Can Med Assoc J. 1976 Jun 5;114(11):1003-12. Can Med Assoc J. 1976. PMID: 776378 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
• Cervical cancer screening. Past success and future challenge.

  Dewar MA, Hall K, Perchalski J. Dewar MA, et al. Prim Care. 1992 Sep;19(3):589-606. Prim Care. 1992. PMID: 1410065 Review.