Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1979 Oct;38(5):434-9.
doi: 10.1136/ard.38.5.434.

An evaluation of criteria for polymyalgia rheumatica

Comparative Study

An evaluation of criteria for polymyalgia rheumatica

H A Bird et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 1979 Oct.

Abstract

There has been little basis on which to standardise a diagnosis of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), and so 11 rheumatology units in the south and west of Great Britain have collaborated in a study to evaluate possible criteria. Symptoms and laboratory findings claimed to be of diagnostic value in PMR were included in an analysis of the features of 236 patients considered to have unequivocal PMR and 70 patients thought to have possible PMR. The results were compared with similar information from 253 patients with conditions that mimic PMR and from 201 consecutive new presentations to outpatients. The 7 most valuable criteria for differentiation were bilateral shoulder pain or stiffness, onset of illness of less than 2 weeks' duration, initial ESR greater than 40 mm/h, duration of morning stiffness exceeding 1 hour, age 65 years or more, depression and/or weight loss, and bilateral tenderness in the upper arms. We suggest that a patient might be regarded as having probable PMR if any 3 or more of these criteria are fulfilled, or if at least 1 criterion coexists with a clinical or pathological abnormality of the temporal artery. A standardised therapeutic test with prednisolone has value in making the diagnosis of PMR more certain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br Med J. 1963 Feb 23;1(5329):513-8 - PubMed
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 1953 Jun;12(2):98-104 - PubMed
    1. J Rheumatol. 1974 Jun;1(2):190-202 - PubMed
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1972 Dec;77(6):845-52 - PubMed
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 1966 May;25(3):203-8 - PubMed

Publication types