Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1979:32:363-82.

Sampling schemes and ascertainment

  • PMID: 523478

Sampling schemes and ascertainment

E A Thompson et al. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1979.

Abstract

Previous approaches to the ascertainment problem have been in terms of a registry-type situation in which the sampled structure is a random variable. However, with the exception of Bailey (1951), previous authors have conditioned on this structure. In extending the theory to pedigrees, a registry situation may also be considered, providing neither the structure nor any part of it (e.g., ages of individuals) are conditioned upon, but it may often be neither practicable nor relevant to do so. In many studies the sampling scheme may fix the number of pedigrees, analyzed, and classical "ascertainment probabilities" are no longer applicable. In an infinite population, in which the ascertainment of and phenotypic observations on, affect neither the distribution of other ascertainments or phenotypic distributions on other pedigrees and chance multiple ascertainments cannot occur, ascertainment corrections are relatively straightforward. However, effective population sizes with regard to particular rare traits may often be small, and the problem of ascertainment corrections in this case has not been fully analyzed, although some preliminary results are presented.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types