Contrast, component duration, and the following schedule of reinforcement
- PMID: 528894
- DOI: 10.1037//0097-7403.5.4.379
Contrast, component duration, and the following schedule of reinforcement
Abstract
Experiment 1 investigated component duration in a four-component multiple schedule designed to separate the effects of the preceding schedule of reinforcement from those of the following schedule of reinforcement. The preceding schedule in the preceding component had no consistent effect regardless of component duration. The following schedule was a powerful determinant of behavior, however, with higher response rates resulting from a following period of extinction. Moreover, the effect of the following schedule was greater with short component durations, which strongly suggests that component-duration effects previously found with multiple schedules are due generally to variation in the degree of control by the following schedule. Experiments 2--4 investigated the basis of the effects of the following schedule. In some situations differential responding in the following component was the controlling variable, but in others it was differential reinforcement in the following component. The results are consistent with the view that response rate during a stimulus is inversely related to the "value" of the following component, where the calculation of value must include both primary and conditioned reinforcement.
Similar articles
-
Behavioral contrast redux.Anim Learn Behav. 2002 Feb;30(1):1-20. doi: 10.3758/bf03192905. Anim Learn Behav. 2002. PMID: 12017964 Review.
-
Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies?J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 May;53(3):359-79. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-359. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990. PMID: 2341820 Free PMC article.
-
Local contrast in multiple schedules: the effect of stimulus discriminability.J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 May;39(3):427-35. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-427. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983. PMID: 6864151 Free PMC article.
-
Conditioned reinforcement versus time to reinforcement in chain schedules.J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 May;53(3):381-93. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-381. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990. PMID: 2341821 Free PMC article.
-
Conditioned reinforcement value and resistance to change.J Exp Anal Behav. 2008 May;89(3):263-98. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2008-89-263. J Exp Anal Behav. 2008. PMID: 18540215 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Devaluation of stimuli contingent on choice: evidence for conditioned reinforcement.J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Jul;48(1):117-31. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-117. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987. PMID: 3625101 Free PMC article.
-
Positive and negative contrast as a function of component duration for key pecking and treadle pressing.J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Mar;37(2):281-93. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-281. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982. PMID: 16812269 Free PMC article.
-
Behavioral contrast redux.Anim Learn Behav. 2002 Feb;30(1):1-20. doi: 10.3758/bf03192905. Anim Learn Behav. 2002. PMID: 12017964 Review.
-
Local contrast in behavior allocation during multiple-schedule components.J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jul;56(1):81-96. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-81. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991. PMID: 16812642 Free PMC article.
-
Does contingent reinforcement strengthen operant behavior?J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Jul;48(1):17-33. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-17. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987. PMID: 16812487 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources