The role of the microbial flora in uremia. I. Survival times of germfree, limited-flora, and conventionalized rats after bilateral nephrectomy and fasting
- PMID: 5324223
- PMCID: PMC2138135
- DOI: 10.1084/jem.123.2.239
The role of the microbial flora in uremia. I. Survival times of germfree, limited-flora, and conventionalized rats after bilateral nephrectomy and fasting
Abstract
Germfree rats were used in 3 experiments to study the effects of the microbial flora on survival time after acute uremia produced by a one-stage bilateral nephrectomy. Germfree rats, limited-flora rats, and conventionalized rats (all maintained continuously in isolators) were subjected to nephrectomy or to sham nephrectomy, deprived of food and water until they died, respectively, of uremia or of starvation, and their survival times compared. To establish a limited defined flora in advance of nephrectomy, germfree rats were either monocontaminated (Staphylococcus albus), dicontaminated (S. albus and Proteus mirabilis) or tetracontaminated (S. albus, S. faecalis, P. mirabilis, and E. coli); to conventionalize germfree rats, they were exposed to the mixed microbial flora contained in the cecal contents of ordinary rats, which was the source of the aforementioned bacteria and which included other uncharacterized microorganisms as well. The intestine of all rats with a limited flora persisted in a morphologic state that was virtually no different from that of the germfree rat, including the presence of an enlarged, thin-walled cecum; by contrast, the intestine of the conventionalized rats permanently assumed the morphological characteristics of ordinary, open-laboratory rats with the cecum reduced to normal size. After nephrectomy and food and water deprivation (death from anuria): (a) All germfree rats but one outlived their conventionalized counterparts in each of the 3 experiments; the 21 germfree rats (127 hr) lived, on the average, 2 days longer than did the 24 conventionalized rats (75 hr). No sex difference was demonstrated. (b) The rats with a limited flora died correspondingly sooner as the complexity of their flora increased; survival time of the tetracontaminated rats was significantly shorter than that of the germfree rats, and statistically no different from that of the conventionalized rats. After sham nephrectomy and food and water deprivation (delayed death from starvation): (a) All rats, irrespective of microbial status or sex, outlived their fasting nephrectomized partners. The conventionalized rats endured starvation approximately 2.5 wk longer than they did anuria and the germfree rats 1 wk longer. (b) All conventionalized rats, both male and female, outlived their respective germfree counterparts by about 1 wk. (c) All males, irrespective of microbial status, survived longer than did the females; the average difference was 4 days. The differences in tolerance to anuria or starvation did not correlate with initial body weight or rate of weight loss.
Similar articles
-
The role of the microbial flora in uremia. II. Uremic colitis, cardiovascular lesions, and biochemical observations.J Exp Med. 1966 Feb 1;123(2):251-66. doi: 10.1084/jem.123.2.251. J Exp Med. 1966. PMID: 5905241 Free PMC article.
-
Response of germfree, conventional, conventionalized and E. coli monocontaminated mice to starvation.J Nutr. 1968 Feb;94(2):151-60. doi: 10.1093/jn/94.2.151. J Nutr. 1968. PMID: 4866341 No abstract available.
-
The enhancing effect of the microbial flora on macrophage function and the immune response. A study in germfree mice.J Exp Med. 1966 Jun 1;123(6):1013-24. doi: 10.1084/jem.123.6.1013. J Exp Med. 1966. PMID: 5328828 Free PMC article.
-
Intestinal microflora: elimination of germfree characteristics by components of the normal microbial flora.Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 1979;1(3):141-52. doi: 10.1016/0147-9571(79)90040-7. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 1979. PMID: 117972 Review. No abstract available.
-
The physiological importance of the colonic microflora.Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1982;77:117-31. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1982. PMID: 6750828 Review.
Cited by
-
Gut Microbiota as a Source of Uremic Toxins.Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jan 1;23(1):483. doi: 10.3390/ijms23010483. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. PMID: 35008909 Free PMC article.
-
Role of the Gut Microbiome in Uremia: A Potential Therapeutic Target.Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 Mar;67(3):483-98. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.09.027. Epub 2015 Nov 15. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016. PMID: 26590448 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Modulation of a Circulating Uremic Solute via Rational Genetic Manipulation of the Gut Microbiota.Cell Host Microbe. 2016 Dec 14;20(6):709-715. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.10.021. Epub 2016 Dec 1. Cell Host Microbe. 2016. PMID: 27916477 Free PMC article.
-
Gut microbial metabolites as multi-kingdom intermediates.Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021 Feb;19(2):77-94. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0438-4. Epub 2020 Sep 23. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021. PMID: 32968241 Review.
-
The gnotobiotic animal as a tool in the study of host microbial relationships.Bacteriol Rev. 1971 Dec;35(4):390-429. doi: 10.1128/br.35.4.390-429.1971. Bacteriol Rev. 1971. PMID: 4945725 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical