Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1970 Apr;49(4):779-90.
doi: 10.1172/JCI106291.

Acute effects of inhaled isoproterenol on the mechanical characteristics of the lungs in normal man

Acute effects of inhaled isoproterenol on the mechanical characteristics of the lungs in normal man

E R McFadden Jr et al. J Clin Invest. 1970 Apr.

Abstract

We investigated the effects of isoproterenol on the pulmonary mechanics of eight healthy male subjects. We measured the flow-volume, pressure-volume, resistance-volume, and pressure-flow relationships of the lungs of our subjects in addition to the forced expiratory volume (FEV(1)). The results of this study confirm earlier observations that isoproterenol produces a considerable decrease in airway resistance but only small changes in maximum expiratory flow. Measurements of static pressure-volume curves showed that isoproterenol caused a temporary decrease in the elastic recoil pressure of the lungs. In five men there were mean falls in recoil pressure of 4.1 cm H(2)O at 85% total lung capacity (TLC), 2.6 cm H(2)O at 75% TLC, and 1.5 cm H(2)O at 50% TLC. We postulate that the reason for the relatively small increments in maximum expiratory flow after isoproterenol is primarily that the effects of airway dilatation are in large part negated by the reduction in lung recoil pressure, which results in a fall in the maximum effective driving force for expiratory air flow, and secondly that there is an increase in the compliance of the flow-limiting airways. These studies emphasize that tests of maximum flow and of airway resistance should not be regarded as invariably interchangeable in the assessment of airway reactions or mild disease of the airways.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Phys Med Biol. 1958 Oct;3(2):174-94 - PubMed
    1. J Appl Physiol. 1964 Mar;19:207-11 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Invest. 1956 Mar;35(3):327-35 - PubMed
    1. J Appl Physiol. 1965 Jul;20(4):653-63 - PubMed
    1. Helv Physiol Pharmacol Acta. 1956;14(3):363-8 - PubMed