Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1979 Nov;10(5):641-6.
doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.5.641-646.1979.

Evaluation of commercial latex agglutination reagents for grouping streptococci

Comparative Study

Evaluation of commercial latex agglutination reagents for grouping streptococci

R R Facklam et al. J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Nov.

Abstract

A total of 155 strains of beta-hemolytic streptococci were serologically grouped by conventional techniques (Lancefield extraction and capillary precipitin testing) and by latex agglutination (LA). Agreement between conventional and LA techniques was 97% when the instructions of the manufacturer for the LA technique were followed. Agreement of 99% was obtained when modified autoclave extracts were used as antigens in the LA procedure. A total of 82 strains of non-beta-hemolytic streptococci were also tested by conventional, prescribed LA, and modified autoclave procedures. The agreement between conventional techniques and both LA procedures was 76%. However, when serological cross-reactions in the conventional grouping procedures were considered as errors, the accuracy of identification of both LA procedures was 88% among the non-beta-hemolytic strains. Of 13 strains of Streptococcus bovis, 10 did not react with the LA group D reagent but were serogroup D by conventional techniques. More S. bovis strains were grouped by the LA technique when extracts of 20 ml of broth cultures were used as antigens; however, cross-reactions were observed with non-group D strains when this technique was applied to them.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Jul;4(1):99-101 - PubMed
    1. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B. 1976 Apr;84(2):79-84 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1975 Jan;1(1):54-60 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Jul;4(1):28-31 - PubMed
    1. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Dec;28(6):972-6 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources