Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1970 Dec;10(12):1127-48.
doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(70)86360-3.

A study of lipid bilayer membrane stability using precise measurements of specific capacitance

A study of lipid bilayer membrane stability using precise measurements of specific capacitance

S H White. Biophys J. 1970 Dec.

Abstract

A method is described for measuring the specific capacitance (C(m)) of lipid bilayer membranes with an estimated experimental error of only 1%. The gross capacitance was measured with an AC Wheatstone bridge and a photographic technique was used to determine the area of thin membrane. The results of measurements on oxidized cholesterol-decane membranes formed in 1 x 10(-2) M KCl show that C(m) depends upon temperature, voltage, time, and the age of the bulk membrane solutions. For a freshly thinned membrane (from 5 week old solution), C(m) increases exponentially from an initial value of 0.432 +/-0.021 (SD) muF/cm(2) with a time constant of approximately 15 min. A 100 mv potential applied across the membrane for 10-20 min prior to making measurements eliminated this time dependence and produced final-state membranes. C(m) of final-state membranes depends upon applied voltage (V(a)) and obeys the equation C(m) = C(0) + betaV(a) (2) where V(a) approximately V(DC) + V(rms) (AC). C(0) and beta depend upon temperature; C(0) decreases linearly with temperature while beta increases linearly. At 20 degrees C, C(0) = 0.559 +/-0.01 (SD) muF/cm(2) and beta = 0.0123 +/-0.0036 (SD) (muF/cm(2))/(mv(2)) and at 34 degrees C, C(0) = 0.472 +/-0.01 and beta = 0.0382 +/-0.0039. These variations in C(m) are interpreted as resulting from thickness changes. The possibility that they result from diffuse layer and/or membrane dielectric phenomena is discussed and found to be unlikely. The results are discussed in terms of membrane stability by constructing hypothetical potential energy vs. thickness curves.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Nature. 1966 May 28;210(5039):953-5 - PubMed
    1. J Theor Biol. 1965 Nov;9(3):422-32 - PubMed
    1. J Theor Biol. 1965 Sep;9(2):278-96 - PubMed
    1. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1967 Feb 1;135(1):20-32 - PubMed
    1. J Mol Biol. 1968 Jan 28;31(2):227-35 - PubMed