Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1976 Jan;37(1):36-42.
doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197601)37:1<36::aid-cncr2820370106>3.0.co;2-a.

111Indium-bleomycin breast and axilla imaging

Comparative Study

111Indium-bleomycin breast and axilla imaging

M J Silverstein et al. Cancer. 1976 Jan.

Abstract

111Indium-Bleomycin (111In-Blm), a new radiopharmaceutical, was administered intravenously to 37 patients with benign and malignant breast lesions. Early and delayed images of both the breasts and axillae were made, and results were correlated with physical examination, histopathology of the excised lesion, mammography, and thermography. In 18 patients with malignant disease, clinical examination of the breast and axilla correlated with histopathology in 78 and 54% of the cases, respectively. Images of the breast were accurate (true positives) in 83% of the cases. Images of the axilla were accurate in 62% of the cases. Mammography was correct and suggested malignancy in 88%, and thermography in 73% of the cases. In 19 patients with benign breast lesions, clinical examination of the breast and axilla correlated with histopathology in 68 and 95% of the cases, respectively. Scans of the breast and axilla were correct (true negative) 79 and 95% of the time, respectively. Mammography was correct, and suggested benignancy, in 53% and thermography in 25% of the cases. Imaging of the breasts using 111In-Blm appears to be as accurate as physical examination and mammography for palpable benign and malignant breast tumors. It is less accurate than mammography for microscopic malignancies. Axillary imaging does not appear to be worthwhile because many axillary metastases are too small for detection with current nuclear medicine instrumentation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources