The evaluation of tests
Abstract
In order to correctly evaluate a test, at least four attributes should be measured: namely, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and precision. Sensitivity is the proportion of diseased animals which are correctly identified, whereas specificity is the proportion of healthy animals which are correctly identified. These two attributes are important, not only because of the reasons implied by their definition but because they influence both the apparent prevalence of disease and proportion of test-positive animals which are actually diseased. The ability of a test to give a true measurement of the substance being measured, its accuracy, and its ability to give consistent results on the same sample, its precision, are good measures of quality control. Both these attributes influence the sensitivity and specificity of the test. Inaccuracies and inconsistencies arise from the test itself, the technician and the nature of the sample being tested.
Similar articles
-
Statistical evaluation of test accuracy studies for Toxoplasma gondii in food animal intermediate hosts.Zoonoses Public Health. 2010 Feb;57(1):82-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2009.01281.x. Epub 2009 Sep 10. Zoonoses Public Health. 2010. PMID: 19744298 Review.
-
Glaucoma diagnostics.Acta Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;91 Thesis 1:1-32. doi: 10.1111/aos.12072. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013. PMID: 23384049
-
Consensus-based reporting standards for diagnostic test accuracy studies for paratuberculosis in ruminants.Prev Vet Med. 2011 Aug 1;101(1-2):18-34. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.04.002. Epub 2011 May 23. Prev Vet Med. 2011. PMID: 21601933
-
[The investigantion of comparative experiments for different clinical laboratory instruments].Zhonghua Shi Yan He Lin Chuang Bing Du Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Feb;27(1):64-6. Zhonghua Shi Yan He Lin Chuang Bing Du Xue Za Zhi. 2013. PMID: 23855135 Chinese.
-
[Concept of reliable laboratory test procedures (author's transl)].Monatsschr Kinderheilkd (1902). 1980 Mar;128(3):118-22. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd (1902). 1980. PMID: 6988699 Review. German.
Cited by
-
A comparison of standard serological tests for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in Canada.Can J Comp Med. 1985 Oct;49(4):391-4. Can J Comp Med. 1985. PMID: 4075239 Free PMC article.
-
Analyses of baseline survey data on rinderpest in Bahr el Ghazal Province, with proposal of an improved vaccination strategy against rinderpest for southern Sudan.Trop Anim Health Prod. 1991 Aug;23(3):186-96. doi: 10.1007/BF02357004. Trop Anim Health Prod. 1991. PMID: 1763441
-
Tuberculosis in East Sussex. III. Comparison of post-mortem and clinical methods for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in badgers.J Hyg (Lond). 1986 Aug;97(1):27-36. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400064329. J Hyg (Lond). 1986. PMID: 3525672 Free PMC article.
-
Sensitivity and specificity of canine serum total amylase and isoamylase activity determinations.Can J Vet Res. 1988 Oct;52(4):473-5. Can J Vet Res. 1988. PMID: 2461794 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of different diagnostic methods for diagnosis of Lumpy skin disease in cows.Trop Anim Health Prod. 2010 Apr;42(4):777-83. doi: 10.1007/s11250-009-9486-5. Epub 2009 Oct 31. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2010. PMID: 19882228
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources