Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1971 Apr;28(2):179-85.
doi: 10.1136/oem.28.2.179.

Effects of chrysotile and acid-treated chrysotile on macrophage cultures

Effects of chrysotile and acid-treated chrysotile on macrophage cultures

E G Beck et al. Br J Ind Med. 1971 Apr.

Abstract

Beck, E. G., Holt, P. F., and Nasrallah, E. T. (1971).Brit. J. industr. Med.,28, 179-185. Effects of chrysotile and acid-treated chrysotile on macrophage cultures. The addition of chrysotile asbestos to monolayer cultures of peritoneal and alveolar macrophages produces an increase in membrane permeability, as measured by eosin uptake and lactic dehydrogenase activity of the supernatant fluid. The lactate synthesis is increased, however. It is suggested that the permeability of the cell membrane is increased while dust particles are being phagocytosed, which may take several hours when the particles are fibrous, but that this does not imply cell damage.

Treatment of chrysotile with acid, which leaves a silica surface, results in a product that reduces lactate synthesis, implying cytotoxicity. This change is counteracted by poly(2-vinyl-pyridine 1-oxide). The polymer does not affect the properties of the native chrysotile.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Med Lav. 1966 Dec;57(12):721-9 - PubMed
    1. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1968 Oct;96(2):443-53 - PubMed
    1. Med Lav. 1968 Oct;59(10):561-76 - PubMed
    1. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1956 Aug;21(2):378-80 - PubMed
    1. Biochem Z. 1957;329(2):112-6 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources