Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1971 Mar;213(2):329-43.
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009385.

Pulmonary stretch receptor activity in man: a comparison with dog and cat

Pulmonary stretch receptor activity in man: a comparison with dog and cat

A Guz et al. J Physiol. 1971 Mar.

Abstract

1. The ;collision' technique has been shown to be suitable for recording orthodromic ;A' fibre activity in a whole, functioning cervical vagus nerve. This activity predominantly arises from pulmonary stretch receptors.2. The amount and frequency of discharge from pulmonary stretch receptors in man, dog and cat, have been shown to increase with inspiration and decrease with expiration-the larger the tidal volume, the greater the discharge. At the end-expiratory level in man and dog, a tonic stretch receptor discharge is present. The results in cat and dog are in broad agreement with older work using single fibre techniques.3. The stretch receptor discharge in man may be greater for a given degree of lung ;stretch' than in cat or dog. There is certainly a discharge during eupnoea in man, and this must be contrasted with the absence of a Hering-Breuer inflation reflex in adult anaesthetized man with lung inflations of the order of a eupnoeic tidal volume. Furthermore, man does not develop slow, deep breathing with bilateral vagal block.4. Since the characteristics of the activity from pulmonary stretch receptors with eupnoea in man are similar to those seen in other species, it must be concluded that this activity does not reach the central threshold to affect the respiratory centre.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ergeb Physiol. 1963;52:74-156 - PubMed
    1. Br J Anaesth. 1968 Jul;40(7):484-92 - PubMed
    1. Klin Wochenschr. 1964 Mar 1;42:239-44 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 1966 Jan;86(1):7-14 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1933 Oct 6;79(3):332-58 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources