Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1977 Sep;13(9):548-56.
doi: 10.1007/BF02627850.

Toxicity of nystatin and its methyl ester toward parental and hybrid mammalian cells

Comparative Study

Toxicity of nystatin and its methyl ester toward parental and hybrid mammalian cells

P B Fisher et al. In Vitro. 1977 Sep.

Abstract

Nystatin methyl ester (NME), the methyl ester derivative of the polyene macrolide antibiotic nystatin, is known to be effective against fungi and is now found to be relatively less toxic than the parent antibiotic nystatin (NYS) to animal cells in culture as measured by 51Cr release, cell survival at different posttreatment periods and cell growth. NYS and NME were tested on TK- mouse (B82) and hamster (B1) cells, HGPRT- mouse (RAG) cells, and on lysolecithin-fused cells selected in HAT medium and confirmed as B82-RAG and B1-RAG hybrids by chromosomal analysis plus polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of lactate dehydrogenase. NME was less toxic and caused less immediate membrane damage than NYS when tested in all five cell systems. However, differences in innate polyene sensitivity were evident between the three parental cell types. B82 and B1 cells were more resistant than RAG cells to NYS and NME. B82-RAG hybrids reflected the higher level resistance of B82 parental cells, and B1-RAG hybrids reflected the higher level resistance of B1 cells. Where one parental cell type is relatively more polyene sensitive, the use of polyenes in the future may be applicable as selective agents in cell hybridization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. In Vitro. 1972 Jul-Aug;8(1):19-25 - PubMed
    1. Nat New Biol. 1971 Jul 7;232(27):31-2 - PubMed
    1. Am J Clin Pathol. 1969 Aug;52(2):138-46 - PubMed
    1. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1972 Apr;25(4):259-60 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1968 Apr 27;218(5139):369-70 - PubMed

Publication types