A study of communication specificity between cells in culture
- PMID: 562887
- PMCID: PMC2111582
- DOI: 10.1083/jcb.75.3.769
A study of communication specificity between cells in culture
Abstract
We have examined the specificity of communication between cells in culture by co-culturing cells derived from mammalian, avian, and arthropod organisms. Both mammalian and avian culture cells have similar gap junctional phenotypes, while the insect (arthropod) cell lines have a significantly different gap junctional structure. Electrophysiological and ultrastructural methods were used to examine ionic coupling and junctional interactions between homologous and heterologous cell types. In homologous cell systems, gap junctions and ionic coupling are present at a high incidence. Also, heterologous vertebrate cells in co-culture can communicate readily. By contrast, practically no coupling (0-8%) is detectable between heterologous insect cell lines (Homopteran or Lepidopteran) and vertebrate cells (mammalian myocardial or 3T3 cells). No gap junctions have been observed between arthropod and vertebrate cell types, even though the heterologous cells may be separated by less than 10 nm. In additional studies, a low incidence of coupling was found between heterologous insect cell lines derived from different arthropod orders. However, extensive coupling was detected between insect cell lines that are derived from the same order (Homoptera). These observations suggest that there is little or no apparent specificity for communication between vertebrate cells in culture that express the same gap junctional phenotype, while there is a definite communication specificity that exists between arthropod cells in culture.
Similar articles
-
Selective gap-junctional communication capacity of transformed and non-transformed rat liver epithelial cell lines.Carcinogenesis. 1988 Aug;9(8):1499-502. doi: 10.1093/carcin/9.8.1499. Carcinogenesis. 1988. PMID: 3402047
-
Non-selective junctional communication between some different mammalian cell types in primary culture.J Cell Sci. 1981 Jun;49:163-75. doi: 10.1242/jcs.49.1.163. J Cell Sci. 1981. PMID: 7309803
-
Gap-junctional communication in a communication-defective and in a communication-competent teratocarcinoma cell line.J Cell Sci. 1985 Jun;76:85-95. doi: 10.1242/jcs.76.1.85. J Cell Sci. 1985. PMID: 3905839
-
Direct intercellular communication in health and disease: an overview.Scott Med J. 1981 Oct;26(4):315-23. doi: 10.1177/003693308102600405. Scott Med J. 1981. PMID: 7031893 Review.
-
[Physiological importance of gap junctions].J Physiol (Paris). 1980 Nov;76(6):529-49. J Physiol (Paris). 1980. PMID: 7003101 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Isolation and characterization of gap junctions from Drosophila melanogaster.Cell Tissue Res. 1989 Apr;256(1):7-16. doi: 10.1007/BF00224713. Cell Tissue Res. 1989. PMID: 2496933
-
Connexin and pannexin mediated cell-cell communication.Neuron Glia Biol. 2007 Aug;3(3):199-208. doi: 10.1017/S1740925X08000069. Neuron Glia Biol. 2007. PMID: 18634611 Free PMC article.
-
Engineering new synaptic connections in the C. elegans connectome.Worm. 2015 Jan 28;4(2):e992668. doi: 10.4161/21624054.2014.992668. eCollection 2015 Apr-Jun. Worm. 2015. PMID: 26430564 Free PMC article.
-
Experimental depression of junctional membrane permeability in mammalian cell culture. A study with tracer molecules in the 300 to 800 Dalton range.J Membr Biol. 1979 Oct 5;50(1):65-100. doi: 10.1007/BF01868788. J Membr Biol. 1979. PMID: 41101
-
Integration of Plasticity Mechanisms within a Single Sensory Neuron of C. elegans Actuates a Memory.Neuron. 2018 Jan 17;97(2):356-367.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.12.027. Epub 2018 Jan 4. Neuron. 2018. PMID: 29307713 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous