Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1977 Dec;36(6):659-69.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.1977.248.

Relevance of density, size and DNA content of tumour cells to the lung colony assay

Free PMC article

Relevance of density, size and DNA content of tumour cells to the lung colony assay

D J Grdina et al. Br J Cancer. 1977 Dec.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Mouse fibrosarcoma tumours were dissociated and divided into subpopulations of viable cells by centrifugation in linear density gradients of Renografin. Two of these subpopulations, designated Band 2 and Band 4, differed in their clonogenic ability in lung colony assay. The less dense Band 2 cells were significantly more clonogenic than the Band 4 cells (2.9 percent vs 1.4 percent respectively). Each band was further separated on the basis of cell size by centrifugal elutriation. Each size class of cells comprising Band 2 showed higher clonogenic ability than the corresponding size class in Band 4. Thus cell size differences were not responsible for the clonogenic differences between these bands. To determine whether cell-cycle distribution of the tumour cells was responsible for differences in cloning efficiency, flow microfluorometric and premature chromosome condensation methods were utilized. The unseparated and Band 4 populations showed a higher percentage of cells in S and G2 than did the Band 2 populations, but many of the S and G2 tumour cells showed extensive chromosome damage. From this study we conclude that the increased clonogenic ability of the lighter tumour cells is not due to differences in cell size or cell-cycle parameters.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1976 Nov;57(5):1139-43 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1974 Jun 21;184(4143):1297-8 - PubMed
    1. Rev Sci Instrum. 1973 Sep;44(9):1301-10 - PubMed
    1. Can J Genet Cytol. 1973 Sep;15(3):605-18 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1975 Mar 20;254(5497):245-7 - PubMed

Publication types