Amniotic fluid shake test versus lecithin-sphingomyelin ratio in the antenatal prediction of respiratory distress syndrome
- PMID: 578601
Amniotic fluid shake test versus lecithin-sphingomyelin ratio in the antenatal prediction of respiratory distress syndrome
Abstract
Surfactant content of 211 amniotic fluid samples raken between 28 and 42 weeks' gestations was determined by the shake test. Parallel with this also the lecithin/sphingomyelin (L/S) ratio was measured in 99 cases. When the test was positive no respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) occurred, while 25 RDS (53.34%) developed in 46 newborns with negative test and 8 RDS (15.38%) in 52 newborns with intermediate test. RDS was observed in all cases when the L/S ratio was below 1.5. At L/S ratios between 1.5 and 2.0, RDS appeared in 50% of the negative tests and 20% of the intermediate tests. However, when the L/S ratio was over 2.0 no RDS occured even in the case of negative tests. For the clinical praxis the positive test gives an exact information; no RDS is to be expected in such cases. In the case of a negative test, however, the authors think is necessary also to determine the L/S ratio.
Similar articles
-
Relation of amniotic fluid lecithin/sphingomyelin ratio and fetal asphyxia to respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants.Can Med Assoc J. 1978 Jun 10;118(11):1384-9. Can Med Assoc J. 1978. PMID: 657031 Free PMC article.
-
Amniotic fluid lecithin/sphingomyelin ratio changes related to centrifugal force.Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Dec;50(6):682-8. Obstet Gynecol. 1977. PMID: 927759
-
Comparison of lecithin: sphingomyelin ratio, fluorescence polarization, and phosphatidylglycerol in the amniotic fluid in the prediction of respiratory distress syndrome.Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Jan;63(1):52-6. Obstet Gynecol. 1984. PMID: 6546316
-
Measurement of amniotic fluid surfactant.Clin Chem. 1981 Oct;27(10):1629-41. Clin Chem. 1981. PMID: 6269778 Review.
-
Prediction of respiratory distress syndrome using the Abbott FLM-II amniotic fluid assay.Clin Chim Acta. 2002 Dec;326(1-2):61-8. doi: 10.1016/s0009-8981(02)00336-4. Clin Chim Acta. 2002. PMID: 12417097 Review.