Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1964 May;87(5):1162-70.
doi: 10.1128/jb.87.5.1162-1170.1964.

Influence of antibiotic stability on the results of in vitro testing procedures

Influence of antibiotic stability on the results of in vitro testing procedures

W E Wick. J Bacteriol. 1964 May.

Abstract

Wick, Warren E. (The Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, Ind.). Influence of antibiotic stability on the results of in vitro testing procedures. J. Bacteriol. 87:1162-1170. 1964.-Certain antibiotics undergo at least partial degradation under the conditions of in vitro testing procedures. With cephalothin used as an example, experimental evidence is presented to indicate the necessity for re-evaluation of results obtained from in vitro sensitivity testing methods for some antibiotics. The in vitro activity of cephalothin, tetracycline, and chloramphenicol against a variety of gram-negative bacteria is described. Plate counts demonstrate changes in the viable cell population over a 48-hr period in tubes of minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) tests, with an abrupt rise in MIC value for cephalothin between the 12th and 24th hr. Data obtained by chromatographic methods, showing the degradation of cephalothin for the same time interval, indicated that instability of the antibiotic between the 12th and 24th hr might adversely affect the results obtained from standard 20- to 24-hr in vitro antibiotic sensitivity testing methods. Because repeated administration of an antibiotic to a patient at 4- to 8-hr intervals reinforces the original concentration, a more accurate estimate of antibacterial activity of that antibiotic might preferably be related to this time interval.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1961 Jan-Feb;2:70-9 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1960 Sep 3;2(5200):694-9 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1963 Jun 29;1(7296):1399-401 - PubMed
    1. J Bacteriol. 1962 Dec;84:1292-6 - PubMed
    1. Arch Intern Med. 1963 Jul;112:21-8 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources